What is the What: A Biography?

From class discussions, there is a strong dislike for the way the story is labeled and told; It is presented as a “fiction” and “autobiography” but written by an author who (Eggers) is far removed from the events itself. But what would happen if this story was labeled an biography? What if instead of I’s and drawing readers into the story with a technique of telling a story which is most acceptable to the masses, the book repeated use of the word he, they, and the distant language from the actual subject? How would this be accepted by the pop culture crowed? Would this even be pop culture? This change would eliminate the factor of buyers and readers having the ability to be apart of a movement (like project red), the book wouldn’t be problematic, but the story of Valentino would not be closely payed attention to, no profits would be made to help the people back in Sudan, and it would be another book on the shelf and another story left untold and more knowledge left unshared to the mainstream.

How would the class respond to the new structure of the book, and how would representation of the subject play a part in the class?


One Response

  1. the biggest thing that would change for me would be the voice of Valentino. A biography lends much more to the voice of the author and not necessarily his/her subject.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: